# QKD paper ## Structure of paper ### Introduction * QKD is important today * BBM92 is a good protocol to use, as a compromise between key rate and security * Fiber-based QKD is useful despite the versatility of free-space implementation * 1310~nm is a good wavelength to use in metropolitan settings * There are practical advantages of 1310nm being able to run C-band classical traffic * Existing works are comparable, but we demonstrate with a setup that is designed for portability ### Quantum channel + deployment Main selling point of the paper. * We demonstrate continuous QKD run over 9 days with bitrate. * Rough description of setup and measurement * Rough description of deployed fiber characteristics * Active polarization compensation performed ### Clock synchronization ### Classical channel ### Application layer * Co-propagation achieved in fiber * QBER contribution ### Discussion ### Comparisons | Paper | Application | Quantum | Classical | Length | Clocksync | |--|--|--|--|--|--| | townsend1997simultaneous | First demo | O-band | C-band | - | | ✔️ thomas2022entanglement | Entanglement distribution, V=71% | O-band, 417MHz pulsed | C-band, 7dBm | 47km | | shi2020stable | QKD BBM92 | O-band | - | 10km | | sanz2025adapting | QKD BBM92 | C-band, Quantum Optics Jena | C-band | 23km | | clark2025coexistence | QKD BBM92 | C-band | C-band | hollow core | | fan2023energy | QKD BBM92 | C-band | C-band, 20Gbps | 45km spool | | krvzivc2023towards | QKD BBM92 | 810nm | - | - | Rb clock | | pelet2023operational | QKD EB-based?? Homebrew | C-band, SNSPD | - | 50km | Rb clock | | wang2017long | QKD BB84 | O-band pulsed | C-band | 80km spool | | ✖️ thomas2023quantum | Teleportation | O-band | C-band | 11km spool | | wang2024time | QKD BB84, time-MUX | C-band pulsed | C-band, 10dBm | 100km |, as well as strong stimulated Raman and Brioullin scattering | mao2018integrating | QKD BB84 | O-band | C-band, 21dBm | 66km |